The Deadlights
|
|
t the time Simon Lake's 1899 drawing was still mostly forgotten in the National Archives and the discovery of cabin deadlights during the 1996 National Park Service underwater site assessment was a surprise. |
| Except for this curt reference in a news release before the first hull plate was removed: "the glass deadlights are sandwiched in place by inner and outer iron rings riveted and bolted together", the Site Assessment report was the only source of information about the deadlights for nearly ten years. The report described them as two inches in diameter, set in five pairs located at intervals from two-foot-six to two-foot-nine along the top of the cabin. The deadlights in each pair were recorded as ten inches apart athwartships. | |
| In June 2005, concretion was removed from one of the deadlights inside the first plate removed and details were provided in photos. A large hinged cover, fastened in place by a pin, protects the interior of each deadlight. A latch, very similar to the hinge, is located on the inboard side. When the latch pin is removed the cover swings down as illustrated. |
|
|
Move your mouse pointer over the graphic above to see the hinged deadlight covers opened. The cover includes a dome-shaped piece of rubber that probably provided a watertight seal in case a glass cracked or broke. The covers would have served a another very practical operational purpose as well. On the water at night, even the light of a candle would have shown through uncovered ports. |
| Although the announcement states that the covers were unlatched by pushing out a hinge pin, I think it's more likely that the fittings indicated by the arrows at right are catches used to lock the covers closed. |
|
| Oddly, there does not appear to be a fitting to lock the cover back in the open position, as you would expect with standard maritime practice and illustrated in the graphic at left. |
|
The deadlights do appear to be located mostly to the sides of crew stations, but in the very limited space an open cover, swinging with the movement of the boat, or even stationary, would be a hazard. Other lock-back mechanisms, such as a wire, not visible under the concretion are possible. The only function of the deadlights would be to allow light into the cabin. They would not be useful and as mentioned above would be dangerous for night-time operations, but even if they were used only for daytime maintenance swinging covers would be hazardous in the cramped cabin. Perhaps the covers were added later to make the boat more stealthy or in response to leaks and left in the closed position. Still it seems some other solution would have be used rather than these complex devices if they were never opened. I had originally used pyramidal deadlight glasses in my construction. Found in many nautical installations, these would have provided more light in the cabin. The Hunley deadlights appear to be simple flat glasses, less than half an inch thick. The hatch lids also have deadlights. These may also be covered, but published x-rays don't show the large, hinged covers revealed in the cabin. Similarly, an x-ray of one of the hatch ports reveals a mounting ring and rivets or bolts but nothing else. |
|
What do you think? |
This page and its contents
© Copyright 2005 Michael & Karen Crisafulli.
All rights reserved.
4 Jul 05